Discussion about this post

User's avatar
steve robertshaw's avatar

Disengage. What you describe is predominately an online phenomena, and the more time someone spends reading (never mind responding to) online opinion sites, the more convinced they become that the entire populace is focusing on whatever is being discussed on that moment's topic. But, and I'd be interested in finding some numbers here, I DON'T think that online opinion and discussion forums (beginning with that wretched 'X') are as predominant as the people who are habituated to reading these sites throughout their day think they are. I personally choose to read only a selected few substacks, like yours, off and on each day. I know many, many people who don't look at ex-twitter or any other less used sites at all. It's a habit that a certain portion of our fellow Americans and global English speakers have developed, and it may be impossible for them to ever break that habit, but it is by no means universal. Heavily online people are just a (fairly small) subset of our population, but unfortunately those involved in running for and holding political office are part of that subset. And so the online universe has a disproportionate influence on our state and national government policies. It is probably going to take generational change to really diminish that. What you propose is necessary, but addicted people can't usually voluntarily change their habits.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts